[ 黃忠 譯 ]——(2005-11-3) / 已閱47276次
[71] GATT Panel Report on the United States-Restrictions on Imports of Tuna, GATT Doc. DS21/R (1991年9月3日), 可查閱1991 WL 771248。
[72] 見(jiàn) Ralph Nader, Introduction to Lori Wallach & Michelle Sforza, The WTO: Five Years of Reasons to Resist Corporate Globalization 6, 6. （1999）（堅(jiān)持認(rèn)為世界貿(mào)易組織和北美自由貿(mào)易區(qū)代表著一個(gè)旨在增加企業(yè)利潤(rùn)卻不負(fù)說(shuō)明責(zé)任的跨國(guó)管理組織）。
[73] 同上. at 10。
[74] 有關(guān)行政法概念在全球背景下的重構(gòu)，即強(qiáng)調(diào)公開(kāi)透明和公法價(jià)值擴(kuò)張的論述，可參考Aman，同前注[60]。
[75] 一般可以參考Daniel D. Bradlow, International Organizations and Private Complaints: The Case of the World Bank Inspection Panel, 34 Va. J. Int’l L. 553, 555 (1994) （“銀行監(jiān)察小組的創(chuàng)設(shè)擴(kuò)大了國(guó)際行政管理法的范圍，從而使之有權(quán)對(duì)國(guó)際組織之間和私人之間有關(guān)國(guó)際組織是否要依從其自身的內(nèi)部操作規(guī)則和程序的爭(zhēng)議作出裁決”）。
[76] 一般可參見(jiàn)Gillian Dale, NAFTA: Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 1996 Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y 26（探討了環(huán)境合作委員會(huì)的組織結(jié)構(gòu)和工作程序）；Sarah Richardson, Sovereignty, Trade, and the Environment-The North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation, 24 Can.-U.S.L.J. 183 (1998)（分析了環(huán)境合作委員會(huì)對(duì)說(shuō)明責(zé)任、公開(kāi)透明和各成員國(guó)合意之達(dá)成的影響）；Stefan R, Miller, Comment, NAFTA: A Model for Reconciling the Conflict Between Free Trade and International Environmental Protection, 56 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 483, 509-22 (1994)（概述了北美自由貿(mào)易區(qū)環(huán)境保護(hù)規(guī)定）。
[77] 一般可參見(jiàn)EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics (Christian Joerges與Ellen Vos主編，1999年出版)（對(duì)歐盟委員會(huì)制度作了簡(jiǎn)要介紹）；Michelle Egan & Dieter Wolf, Regulation and Comitology: The EC Committee System in Regulatory Perspective, 4 Colum. J. Eur. L 499 (1998)（概述了歐盟行政管理體制中的執(zhí)委會(huì)程序的作用）。
[78] 有關(guān)在營(yíng)養(yǎng)藥典會(huì)議中非政府組織監(jiān)察員權(quán)利的討論，可以參閱：Robert F. Housman, Democratizing International Trade Decision-Making, 27 Cornell Int’l L.J. 699, 718-20 (1994); Lori M, Wallach, Accountable Governance in the Era of Globalization: The WTO, NAFTA, and International Harmonization of Standards, 50 U. Kan. L. Rev. 823, 836-38 (2002); Lewis Rosman, Note, Public Participation in International Pesticide Regulation: When the Codex Commission Decides, Who Will Listen?, 12 Va. Envtl. L.J. 329 (1993).有關(guān)非政府組織監(jiān)察員及其在其它國(guó)際協(xié)議和組織中的參加權(quán)的討論，可以參閱：Kathleen Rogers & James A. Moore, Revitalizing the Convention on Nature Protection and Wild Life Preservation in the Western Hemisphere: Might Awakening a Visionary but “Sleeping” Treaty Be the Key to Preserving Biodiversity and Threatened Natural Areas in the Americas?, 36 Harv. Int’I L.J. 465, 502-05 (1995)（描述了非政府組織在國(guó)際環(huán)保法中日益重要的作用）；Kal Raustiala, Note, The “Participatory Revolution” in International Environmental Law, 21 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 537, 547-48 (1997)（討論了非政府組織在瀕臨滅絕物種的國(guó)際貿(mào)易大會(huì)中的廣泛參與）；類(lèi)似的討論還可參見(jiàn)：Daniel Vice, Note, Implementation of Biodiversity Treaties: Monitoring, Fact-Finding, and Dispute Resolution, 29 N.Y.U.J.Int’l L. & Pol. 577, 616-19 (1997)。
[79] Alfred C. Aman Jr., Privatization and the Democracy Problem in Globalization: Making Markets More Accountable Through Administrative Law, 28 Fordham Urb. L.J.1477, 1479, 1505-06 (2001) (認(rèn)為通過(guò)國(guó)內(nèi)市場(chǎng)與全球利益網(wǎng)絡(luò)的聯(lián)系可以抵消全球民主缺失)。
總共5頁(yè) [1] [2] [3] [4] 5
上一頁(yè)
