當(dāng)前位置：法律圖書(shū)館>>法治動(dòng)態(tài)>>期刊目錄>>《法學(xué)雜志》2012年第四期目錄與摘要

《法學(xué)雜志》2012年第四期目錄與摘要

http://m.cehavas.com　 2012-7-24 14:53:34　 來(lái)源：中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)網(wǎng)

1 、“一國(guó)兩制”視野下法律文化的同一性與多樣性及其在中國(guó)的體現(xiàn)——寫(xiě)在中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義法律體系形成之后  朱力宇（中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;  
【摘要】 法律文化的概念外延包括了規(guī)范制度形態(tài)、意識(shí)觀念形態(tài)、實(shí)踐活動(dòng)形態(tài)的法律文化。法律體系問(wèn)題主要屬于規(guī)范制度形態(tài)的法律文化,而法系的問(wèn)題主要屬于意識(shí)觀念形態(tài)和實(shí)踐活動(dòng)形態(tài)的法律文化。由于實(shí)行"一國(guó)兩制",在"兩岸三地"即中國(guó)大陸、香港、澳門(mén)和臺(tái)灣存在著多種法律體系與法系,這是"中國(guó)特色"的體現(xiàn)。中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義法律體系形成之后,我們還可以在"一國(guó)兩制"的視野下,繼續(xù)探討法律文化的同一性與多樣性問(wèn)題,對(duì)中西方法律文化中蘊(yùn)藏的優(yōu)秀精神——對(duì)法治的崇尚和對(duì)統(tǒng)治的信念,通過(guò)實(shí)踐不斷地選擇,融化成一種嶄新的、先進(jìn)的法律文化體系,將法治精神與民族精神融為一體,建成法治國(guó)家�！�
【Abstract】 The concept and extension of legal culture is reflected in three aspects: the norms, awareness and practices. The legal system belongs to the "norms" part of legal culture, as the system of law belongs to the "awareness" and "practices" part. Because of the implementation of "one country two systems”, there are varieties of legal systems and systems of law in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, which is the embodiment of the "China’s characteristics”. After the formation of the socialist legal system of China’s characteristics, we can also continue to explore the identity and diversity of the legal culture in view of "one country two systems."
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 法律文化； 法律體系； 法系； 中國(guó)特色； 同一性； 多樣性；
【Key words】 legal culture legal system system of law with China’s characteristics identity diversity；
 
2  、論慎刑理念對(duì)古代司法運(yùn)行機(jī)制的影響  林明（山東大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 慎刑理念作為中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)司法文化的重要組成部分,是傳統(tǒng)司法文化中最能夠代表主流司法理念的內(nèi)容。所謂"慎刑"就是主張?jiān)谶m用法律、實(shí)施刑罰時(shí)應(yīng)該審慎、寬緩,無(wú)論立法、司法都必須崇德,施用刑罰要慎重從事。儒家秉持的人本主義,"仁政"理念,為政以德和"執(zhí)中致和"等思想是慎刑理念發(fā)展延續(xù)的理論基礎(chǔ)。慎刑理念主要在司法機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置、司法官吏的執(zhí)法要求和違法責(zé)任的追究、司法審判方式和原則、訴訟審判程序等方面對(duì)古代司法制度的設(shè)計(jì)與運(yùn)行產(chǎn)生了十分重要的影響。研究這種理念、制度的發(fā)生和存在的意義在于不僅可以加深我們對(duì)中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)司法文化特征及其歷史價(jià)值的認(rèn)識(shí),而且對(duì)于我們?nèi)绾卧诋?dāng)代的社會(huì)主流文化中創(chuàng)新與時(shí)代發(fā)展相適應(yīng)的司法理念和司法制度,具有啟示意義。 　
【Abstract】 The idea of careful criminal punishment is one vital part of traditional Chinese judicial culture, a representative of the mainstream thought in traditional judicial culture. The coral spirit of careful criminal punishment is the proposition that whenever a law is enforced and a form of punishment is imposed, doing so needs due deliberation and leniency; that both legislation and judiciary should submit to the moral principles, and special attention should be paid to enforcement of punishment. The Confucian thoughts like humanism, the idea of "humanistic governance”, to govern by morality and the idea of "harmony by way of balance" are the ground stone for the ideas of careful criminal punishment to survive in history. The important influences that the ideas of careful criminal punishment have cast upon the judicial system are salient in respect of judicial institutions, attribution of responsibilities for judicial officials, the ways and principles of judicial adjudication, as well as the procedures. The value that study of these ideas may generate is that our knowledge about traditional Chinese judicial culture and its historical value will thus be deepened, and it is also enlightening for us who are in the middle of the mainstream of the current social and cultural movements to reshape our judicial ideas and institutions and bring them up to the date.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 慎刑； 德主刑輔； 明德慎罰； 儒家； 司法機(jī)制；
【Key words】 careful criminal punishment moral with punishment clear moral with careful criminal punishment Confucianism judicial institutions；
  
3、 農(nóng)民工權(quán)利司法救濟(jì)路徑探析  黃進(jìn)才（河南師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;   
【摘要】 當(dāng)前,我國(guó)農(nóng)民工權(quán)利的保護(hù)仍存在諸多問(wèn)題,各種歧視、克扣、剝奪農(nóng)民工應(yīng)得權(quán)益的現(xiàn)象依然普遍存在,通過(guò)法律路徑保護(hù)農(nóng)民工權(quán)利已變得刻不容緩,而司法救濟(jì)又是其中最權(quán)威、最有效的一種路徑。在司法救濟(jì)方面一是要建立完善的民事訴訟機(jī)制,二是要構(gòu)建健全的勞動(dòng)爭(zhēng)議處理模式,三是要建立完善的訴費(fèi)救助制度,四是要建立完善的法律援助機(jī)制,以期農(nóng)民工權(quán)利受損時(shí)能得到及時(shí)有效的救濟(jì)。 　
【Abstract】 There are so many obvious deficiencies in the protection system for rights of immigrant workers that their rights are often impaired and deprived universally in China. This demands immediate attention on the protection on the rights of immigrant workers through reforming the China’s legal system. Since the judicial remedy system are the most effective and authoritative way for rights protection, the author presents four points on the improvement of the judicial remedy system for immigrant workers: the first is to improve the present civil law procedure relating to the protection of immigrant workers, the second is to establish a complete settlement mechanism of labor disputes, the third is to reform the litigation costs system to help immigrant workers, and the last is to strengthen the legal aid mechanism. And the author expects that the impaired rights of immigrant workers could be immediately and effectively relieved by the suggestions above mentioned.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 司法救濟(jì)； 民事訴訟機(jī)制； 勞動(dòng)爭(zhēng)議處理模式； 訴費(fèi)救助制度； 法律援助機(jī)制；
【Key words】 judicial remedy system civil law procedure settlement mechanism of labor disputes litigation costs system legal aid
 
4 、流浪兒童乞討權(quán)規(guī)制的法理思考  陳雄（河南工業(yè)大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;  
【摘要】 當(dāng)下中國(guó)城市有一個(gè)令人痛心的圖景,那就是流浪乞討兒童的大量存在。要從根本上保障流浪乞討兒童的權(quán)益,就要立法禁止兒童乞討,建立起對(duì)相關(guān)人員和機(jī)構(gòu)的責(zé)任追究制度,從制度上防范兒童流浪乞討。同時(shí),應(yīng)化解在城市生活的農(nóng)村戶(hù)籍兒童所面臨的物質(zhì)和精神層面的諸種現(xiàn)實(shí)難題,踐行保障兒童權(quán)益的國(guó)際法基本原則。 更多還原
【Abstract】 Contemporary Chinese cities have a distressing picture,i.e.,there are a lot of street children. To safeguard street children’ rights, it is necessary to enact laws to prohibit child begging, and establish an accountability system for personnel and institutions. At the same time, to resolve unites in practical problem of the rural household in the city life faced by children in the material and spiritual level, to practice the principles of international law.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 流浪兒童； 乞討； 立法禁止；
【Key words】 street children beg legislation to ban；
 
5、 試論證券投資者保護(hù)基金有限責(zé)任公司在證券公司破產(chǎn)中的作用  王欣新;亢力（中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;  
【摘要】 我國(guó)于2005年8月成立了中國(guó)證券投資者保護(hù)基金有限責(zé)任公司,公司成立后參與大量證券公司的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)處置與破產(chǎn)程序,對(duì)保護(hù)投資者利益,推動(dòng)證券公司有序退市,維護(hù)資本市場(chǎng)穩(wěn)定發(fā)揮了重要作用。但因立法對(duì)保護(hù)基金公司在證券公司破產(chǎn)程序中的地位尤其是在債權(quán)人會(huì)議中的特殊地位及權(quán)利義務(wù)缺乏具體規(guī)定,使其在履行職責(zé)方面遇到一些困難。本文介紹了保護(hù)基金公司成立的特殊背景、性質(zhì)及其在證券公司風(fēng)險(xiǎn)處置和破產(chǎn)中的現(xiàn)實(shí)作用,結(jié)合證券公司破產(chǎn)的實(shí)踐,研究保護(hù)基金公司參與證券公司破產(chǎn)清算的主要問(wèn)題,考察境外類(lèi)似機(jī)構(gòu)在證券公司破產(chǎn)清算中的特殊作用和經(jīng)驗(yàn),分析保護(hù)基金公司在債權(quán)人會(huì)議中的作用,并提出制定《證劵投資者保護(hù)基金條例》的建議,以完善證劵公司破產(chǎn)的若干具體制度規(guī)定。 　
【Abstract】 In August 2005,China Securities Investor Protection Fund Corporation (SIPF) was founded. After its establishment, it took part in a large number of cases about risk treatments and bankruptcy proceedings of securities companies, and played an important role in protecting the interests of investors, promoting the withdrawal from the market orderly of the securities companies, maintaining the stability of the financial market and so on. But because there are lack of specific rules about the status of SIPF in bankruptcy proceedings of securities companies, especially in the aspect of meeting of creditors,SIPF faces some difficulties when it performs its duties. This article is written on the basis of SIPF’s research project "The Role of the SIPF in Creditors’ Meeting”, and is written in the view of how to strengthen the influence of the SIPF in the securities companies’ bankruptcy. This article introduces the special background of the establishment of the SIPF,the nature and the practical effect in the risk treatment and bankruptcy of the securities companies.Besides,it researches the main problems occurring in the process of SIPF’s participation of the securities companies bankruptcy, studies the special effects and experiences other similar agencies playing in the process of securities companies bankruptcy, and analyses the effects that the SIPF makes in the creditors’ meetings combined with practice of bankruptcy of the securities corporations, and then the article will give some legislative proposals about the improvement of relative legal institutions.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 保護(hù)基金公司； 證券公司破產(chǎn)； 債權(quán)人會(huì)議；
【Key words】 SIPF securities companies bankruptcy meeting of creditors；
 
6 、有擔(dān)保債權(quán)在公司重整程序中的限制  季境（西南政法大學(xué)應(yīng)用法學(xué)院）;田曉（太平洋證劵股份有限公司）;  
【摘要】 在傳統(tǒng)破產(chǎn)法上,有擔(dān)保債權(quán)一直處于一種較為優(yōu)越的地位,無(wú)論是破產(chǎn)清算程序還是破產(chǎn)和解程序,都較少對(duì)該種權(quán)利及其權(quán)利人產(chǎn)生實(shí)質(zhì)的影響。重整制度的出現(xiàn)打破了這一既有狀態(tài),為了實(shí)現(xiàn)債務(wù)人重建與復(fù)興的目標(biāo),需要對(duì)有擔(dān)保債權(quán)的內(nèi)容及其行使進(jìn)行必要的限制,這種限制應(yīng)具體反映在重整法律的制度設(shè)計(jì)中,如此即能夠完成債務(wù)人重建與復(fù)興的目標(biāo),也能同時(shí)兼顧相關(guān)債權(quán)人的利益。　
【Abstract】 In traditional bankruptcy law, the secured creditors have been in a more advantageous position, whether the bankruptcy liquidation procedure or the conciliation proceedings affect the realization of their rights. The reorganization system change the traditional rules, in order to achieve the goal of the editor’s reconstruction and rehabilitation, the secured claims should be limited to some degree. These kinds of restrictions should be reflected in design of specific legal rules, not only for completing the goal of reconstruction, but also taking into account the relevant interests of creditors.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 公司重整； 有擔(dān)保債權(quán)； 限制；
【Key words】 company reorganization secured claims restriction；
 
7 、論違約金的性質(zhì)——以《合同法》第114條為視角  孫瑞璽（中國(guó)石油大學(xué)）;  
 
【摘要】 我國(guó)《合同法》第114條約定違約金的性質(zhì)得由當(dāng)事人自由約定。對(duì)違約金的性質(zhì)沒(méi)有約定或者約定不明確的,當(dāng)事人可以通過(guò)補(bǔ)充協(xié)議的方式來(lái)約定或者明確違約金的性質(zhì)。不能達(dá)成補(bǔ)充協(xié)議,應(yīng)當(dāng)通過(guò)補(bǔ)充性解釋來(lái)確定違約金的性質(zhì)。以上方法依次用盡,仍不能確定約定違約金的性質(zhì)的,應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)定約定違約金的性質(zhì)是賠償性為主、懲罰性為輔�！逗贤�法》第114條第3款是賠償性違約金,不是懲罰性違約金。《合同法》第114條第1款"約定因違約產(chǎn)生的損失賠償額的計(jì)算方法"得出的損害賠償額是賠償性違約金。 　
【Abstract】 The nature of the liquidated damages of Article 114 of PRC Contract Law should be agreed on freely by the parties. On the legal nature of liquidated damages with no or unclear stipulation, the parties may agree to or stipulate it through supplementary agreement. In case of failure in doing so, the parties should confirm the legal nature of liquidated damages by supplementary explanations. If they still cannot determine the legal nature of liquidated damages with the above method used, the parties should determine its compensation nature of the liquidated damages, with supplementary punishment. Article 114 Clause 3 of PRC Contract Law stipulates the compensation liquidated damages, not punitive damages. Article 114 Clause 1 of PRC Contract Law, upon the calculating method of compensation for losses resulting from the breach of contract obtaining the amount of damages, is the compensation liquidated damages.
 
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 《合同法》第114條； 約定違約金； 法定違約金； 賠償性違約金； 懲罰性違約金； 任意性規(guī)范； 補(bǔ)充性解釋?zhuān)?BR>【Key words】 Article 114 of PRC Contract Law liquidated damages and statutory damages compensation of liquidated damages and punitive damages arbitrary norms supplementary explanations；
 
8 、土地征收行政復(fù)議中申請(qǐng)人的認(rèn)定  李延榮（中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院蘇州研究院）;張巖（北京市人民政府法制辦公室）;  
【摘要】 土地征收行政復(fù)議案件具有明顯的特殊性,作為申請(qǐng)人的土地權(quán)利人的情況比較復(fù)雜,導(dǎo)致復(fù)議案件中申請(qǐng)人資格的認(rèn)定有一定難度。在具體的復(fù)議案件中,申請(qǐng)人的認(rèn)定除依據(jù)一般標(biāo)準(zhǔn)外,還應(yīng)考慮申請(qǐng)人提起復(fù)議所針對(duì)的具體行政行為,視不同具體行政行為來(lái)判定申請(qǐng)人是否適格,可以減輕申請(qǐng)人認(rèn)定的難度,對(duì)于提高土地征收行政復(fù)議案件審查的效率、維護(hù)申請(qǐng)人的合法權(quán)益,都具有積極意義。 　
【Abstract】 Cases of land expropriation administrative reconsideration have obvious particularity. The situation of the land rights holders, as applicants, is more complex, which makes it harder to recognize the qualifications of the applicants in the administrative reconsideration. This article holds the view that the identification of the applicants in specific cases, except pursuant to the general standards, the specific administrative action which the applicants bring against should also be taken into consideration so that whether the applicants are qualified or cannot be judged based on such different specific administrative action, which is of great positive significance that it can alleviate the difficulties of applicant identification, improve the efficiency of the administrative reconsideration of land expropriation, and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the applicant in a timely manner.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 土地征收； 行政復(fù)議； 申請(qǐng)人； 資格認(rèn)定；
【Key words】 land expropriation administrative reconsideration applicant qualification；
 
9 、我國(guó)農(nóng)村土地家庭承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)的權(quán)利主體探究  肖立梅（山東政法學(xué)院）;  
 
【摘要】 家庭承包是農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)中非常重要的一種方式,家庭承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)的權(quán)利主體是集體經(jīng)濟(jì)組織成員還是農(nóng)戶(hù)直接影響到了該權(quán)利的利益歸屬以及存續(xù)過(guò)程中的權(quán)利變更。結(jié)合我國(guó)農(nóng)村歷史發(fā)展?fàn)顩r和現(xiàn)行法律的立法目的,應(yīng)該明確家庭承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)的實(shí)質(zhì)權(quán)利主體應(yīng)為集體經(jīng)濟(jì)組織成員,該權(quán)利具有成員權(quán)的屬性,是農(nóng)村集體經(jīng)濟(jì)組織成員人人平等享有的權(quán)利,農(nóng)戶(hù)只是家庭承包中的形式主體。
【Abstract】 Household contract is an important form of land contractual management in rural areas. The subject of contractual management right on household basis has influenced the profit ownership of the right and the alteration of the existing right. Considering the countryside history development condition and the legal goal of the law in effect, we confirm that the substance subject of the right of household contractual management shall be member of collective economic organization, and this right has nature of right to membership, which is enjoyed by every member of the collective economic organization. The farm family is only a formal subject of household contract.
 
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 家庭承包； 權(quán)利主體； 集體經(jīng)濟(jì)組織成員； 農(nóng)戶(hù)；
【Key words】 household contract subject of right member of collective economic organization farm family；
 
10 、法律視角下農(nóng)業(yè)企業(yè)與農(nóng)戶(hù)間的關(guān)系探析  范少虹（華南師范大學(xué)）;  
【摘要】 我國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)龍頭企業(yè)與農(nóng)戶(hù)間應(yīng)形成利益共享、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)共擔(dān)的機(jī)制,連接二者利益關(guān)系的行為具有民事法律性,但基層政府意志的滲透和交易主體地位事實(shí)不對(duì)等等因素,使這種一般屬性的民事法律行為具有了特殊性。據(jù)此,從農(nóng)戶(hù)、農(nóng)業(yè)龍頭企業(yè)和政府三個(gè)層面分析各自的權(quán)義結(jié)構(gòu),致力于權(quán)利、義務(wù)的較優(yōu)分配與組合,可以獲得最優(yōu)的履約承諾和信任,實(shí)現(xiàn)農(nóng)業(yè)龍頭企業(yè)與農(nóng)戶(hù)的良性有序發(fā)展。
【Abstract】 The leading agricultural enterprises and farmers should form the benefit-sharing, risk-sharing mechanism, the act connecting the two benefits has a civil legal, because of the will of the government infiltration and the main transaction parts’ position unequal, so that the kinds of general property has the particularity of civil legal action.Accordingly,this article from the farmers, leading agricultural enterprises and the government, analyses their respective rights and obligations. The rights and obligations have better allocation and portfolio in order to obtain optimal performance commitments and the confidence in leading agricultural enterprises and farmers.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 農(nóng)業(yè)龍頭企業(yè)； 民事法律性； 權(quán)義結(jié)構(gòu)；
【Key words】 leading agricultural enterprises civil legal the structure of right and obligation；
 
 
11 、我國(guó)合同能源管理法律關(guān)系探究  王曉明（北京聯(lián)合大學(xué)應(yīng)用文理學(xué)院）;  
【摘要】 我國(guó)從國(guó)外引進(jìn)的合同能源管理是一種推廣節(jié)省能源新技術(shù)的模式,在實(shí)際運(yùn)行中需要協(xié)調(diào)與整合技術(shù)、資金、設(shè)施建設(shè)與項(xiàng)目管理等多方面的關(guān)系,因而,我國(guó)對(duì)合同能源管理、能源管理合同屬性的認(rèn)識(shí)比較模糊,并存在多種看法。為此,必須厘清合同能源管理所涉及的法律關(guān)系,充分解析能源管理合同的法律屬性,分析把握合同能源管理運(yùn)營(yíng)中資產(chǎn)等所有權(quán)歸屬問(wèn)題,在我國(guó)現(xiàn)有法律體系框架范圍內(nèi),正確、有效地調(diào)整合同能源管理關(guān)系,積極促進(jìn)節(jié)能新技術(shù)在全社會(huì)的推廣、普及。
【Abstract】 Energy performance contracting that China introduced from abroad is a model of energy saving technology application and promotion, it needs to coordination and integrate the relations among technology,capital,infrastructure construction, project management and other aspects during the practical operation. At present, people in China have multiple views on the contract attribute of energy performance contracting, and energy-saving service,therefore,we must clarify the legal relations of energy performance contracting,analyse the equipment ownership problems during the operation of energy performance contracting, grasp the legal attribute of energy performance contracting correctly. In our existing legal system framework, we must adjust the relations of energy performance contracting, and extend the new energy saving technology in the whole society.
 
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 合同能源管理； 能源管理合同； 法律屬性； 法律調(diào)整；
【Key words】 energy performance contracting energy saving service mechanism legal relationship legal regulation；
 
12 、我國(guó)《勞動(dòng)合同法》中的告知義務(wù)研究  丁啟明;楊鐵軍（大慶師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;
 
【摘要】 《勞動(dòng)合同法》設(shè)置告知義務(wù)的目的是保障當(dāng)事人之間信息順暢流通,促使信息實(shí)現(xiàn)均衡,在此基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)對(duì)該法中與告知義務(wù)有關(guān)法條的深度解釋,使告知義務(wù)在法律實(shí)踐中發(fā)揮出更積極的作用。
【Abstract】 The aim of the informed obligation which is set in China Labor Contract Law is to main the information smoothing between the parties, and promotes the balance of information. For this reason, the relative articles with informed obligation in this act would be interpreted, and the informed obligation would have the positive effects in legal practice.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 勞動(dòng)合同； 告知義務(wù)； 責(zé)任；
【Key words】 labor contract informed obligation duty；
  
13 、被保險(xiǎn)人施救義務(wù)比較研究  伍堅(jiān)（華東政法大學(xué)）;  
【摘要】 在人壽保險(xiǎn)以外的其他類(lèi)型保險(xiǎn)中,被保險(xiǎn)人應(yīng)在事故發(fā)生后承擔(dān)施救義務(wù)。被保險(xiǎn)人應(yīng)主動(dòng)履行施救義務(wù),如果保險(xiǎn)人就如何施救給出指示,被保險(xiǎn)人應(yīng)遵照?qǐng)?zhí)行。被保險(xiǎn)人履行施救義務(wù)時(shí)發(fā)生的必要、合理費(fèi)用,保險(xiǎn)人應(yīng)予以補(bǔ)償,但補(bǔ)償金額原則上不應(yīng)超過(guò)保險(xiǎn)金額。如果被保險(xiǎn)人違反施救義務(wù),保險(xiǎn)人對(duì)由此發(fā)生或者擴(kuò)大的損失不負(fù)賠付責(zé)任。
【Abstract】 In all kinds of insurance except life insurance, the insured shall have an obligation to prevent or mitigate losses after an insured risk occurs. The insured should take the initiative to perform this obligation, and should obey the instructions of the insurer. All the necessary and reasonable costs paid by the insured to prevent or mitigate the losses shall be covered by the insurer. If the insured fails to perform the obligation, and as a result, the losses occur or enlarge, the insurer does not bear the liability for indemnity.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 被保險(xiǎn)人； 施救義務(wù)； 施救費(fèi)用； 法律后果；
【Key words】 the insured obligation of preventing or mitigating losses costs paid to prevent or mitigate the losses the legal consequences；
 
 
14 、銷(xiāo)售假冒注冊(cè)商標(biāo)的商品罪停止形態(tài)研究  劉憲權(quán);張�。ㄈA東政法大學(xué)）;  
【摘要】 銷(xiāo)售假冒注冊(cè)商標(biāo)的商品罪具有未遂形態(tài),應(yīng)以15萬(wàn)元和25萬(wàn)元分別作為本罪未遂數(shù)額較大和數(shù)額巨大的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。在既、未遂形態(tài)并存時(shí),只要已售部分達(dá)到既遂數(shù)額標(biāo)準(zhǔn),就應(yīng)整體評(píng)價(jià)為犯罪既遂。既、未遂并存的量刑模式在兩部分均符合相應(yīng)形態(tài)數(shù)額標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的前提下,應(yīng)選擇性適用先并后定再調(diào)整或先定后并二次調(diào)整以有利于被告人;在僅有單一部分達(dá)到相應(yīng)形態(tài)數(shù)額標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時(shí),不應(yīng)對(duì)另一部分僅作為量刑情節(jié)考慮。
【Abstract】 Crime of Selling Commodities Bearing Counterfeited Registered Trademarks has its attempt form. The standard by which to evaluate whether the amount of sales sums up to relatively large or huge should be 150,000 or 250,000 RMB.If a crime consists of both attempt part and accomplished part, it should be considered as entirely the accomplished one as long as the accomplished part meets the least standard of crime. In favor of the defendant, when both parts exist and reach the crime level, sentences should be made according to either rule as sentence after combination with further adjustment, or combination after sentence with twice adjustment. In the situation that only one part meets the crime, sentence shouldn’t be made without considering the other part.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 銷(xiāo)售； 假冒注冊(cè)商標(biāo)； 商品； 停止形態(tài)； 未遂； 數(shù)額；
【Key words】 selling counterfeited registered trademarks commodities cessation pattern attempt crime；
 
15 、論主客觀相統(tǒng)一原則在犯罪論中的貫徹——兼論丟失槍支不報(bào)罪的犯罪構(gòu)成  魏建文（西南政法大學(xué)）;  
【摘要】 主客觀相統(tǒng)一原則要求犯罪成立要符合主觀要件與客觀要件之間的統(tǒng)一。但是,當(dāng)成立犯罪要求發(fā)生實(shí)質(zhì)性的危害結(jié)果時(shí),就出現(xiàn)了貫徹該原則難以解決的理論難題。對(duì)于"丟失槍支不報(bào)罪"等以發(fā)生嚴(yán)重后果為構(gòu)成要件的犯罪情形,實(shí)踐中所犯的普遍性錯(cuò)誤就在于割裂了行為結(jié)果與行為性質(zhì)的聯(lián)系,將行為人對(duì)一般違法性質(zhì)的認(rèn)識(shí)因素當(dāng)做對(duì)刑法的嚴(yán)重危害性質(zhì)的認(rèn)識(shí)予以評(píng)價(jià),從而得出行為人行為時(shí)出于故意的錯(cuò)誤結(jié)論。因此,《刑法》將沒(méi)有必然聯(lián)系的"不報(bào)告行為"與"嚴(yán)重結(jié)果"規(guī)定為丟失槍支不報(bào)罪的客觀要件,忽視了丟失槍支行為才是嚴(yán)重后果發(fā)生的真正原因。為此建議將該罪罪名改為"丟失槍支罪",以使該原則在犯罪論領(lǐng)域得到貫徹。
【Abstract】 The Principle of Correspondence between subjectivity and objectivity requires that the establishment of a crime should accord with the correspondence between the subjective elements and the objective elements.However,when the crime of establishing needs the substantiality harmful consequences to be happened, a theory problem which is difficult and hard to solve would appear during implementing such principle. For this purpose, this article would go on the analysis from the cognition factors of purposive "know perfectly well”, combining the case of "losing the firearms without reporting the crime" and some other cases which also take the severe consequences happened as the situations of committing a crime of constitution elements, thinking that the universality mistakes which are made during the practice are because the relationship between the result of action and the nature of action is cut apart, it has taken the doer’s cognition factors towards the nature of general irregularity as the cognition of severe harmful nature of criminal law and gives estimates, thus reaching the wrong conclusion that the action of the doer is purposive.Therefore,the criminal law prescribes that "action without reporting" and "severe consequences" which lack of positive connection should be the objective elements of "losing the firearms without reporting the crime”, which ignores the real reason of happening the severe consequences is the action of losing the firearms. For this purpose, the article suggests that the crime should be changed as "the crime of losing the firearms”, which would make the principle performed in the field of Criminal Theory.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 主客觀相統(tǒng)一原則； 故意； 明知； 丟失槍支不報(bào)罪；
【Key words】 the principle of correspondence between subjectivity and objectivity purposive know perfectly well losing the firearms without
 
16 、刑法規(guī)范對(duì)非刑事法律規(guī)范的獨(dú)立性闡釋研究  吳允鋒（華東政法大學(xué)）;   
【摘要】 刑法規(guī)范在對(duì)非刑事法律規(guī)范具有一定依附性的同時(shí),更表現(xiàn)出作為刑法規(guī)范本身的獨(dú)立性。由于立法技術(shù)的要求、刑法規(guī)范目的的需要以及法律法規(guī)變遷等原因,在刑法規(guī)范解釋過(guò)程中,對(duì)一些刑法概念、用語(yǔ)的解釋不能當(dāng)然地依據(jù)法律、行政法規(guī)的相關(guān)規(guī)定,在運(yùn)用適當(dāng)?shù)慕忉屢?guī)則的前提下,對(duì)刑法用語(yǔ)做出不同于法律、行政法規(guī)的解釋并不當(dāng)然違背罪刑法定原則。非刑事法律規(guī)范對(duì)某些概念外延所做出的擴(kuò)大適用的指引性規(guī)則亦并不當(dāng)然適用于刑法領(lǐng)域,刑法中對(duì)此仍應(yīng)做出獨(dú)立性的適用。
【Abstract】 While being dependent on non-criminal norm to certain degree, criminal norm has it own independence. Due to the legislative requirements, regulative needs of criminal norm and changes in laws, interpretation of some concepts and terms in criminal law should not be necessarily based on relevant provisions in other laws and administrative regulations when explaining criminal norms. While following proper interpretative rules, it is not against the principal that crime and punishment should be provided by law if explanations of certain terms in criminal law are different from those made according to other laws and administrative regulations. Guidelines for expanding the application of non-criminal norm to some concepts are not applicable in criminal law, which should be followed independently.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 刑法規(guī)范； 非刑事法律規(guī)范； 獨(dú)立性；
【Key words】 criminal norm non-criminal norm independence；
 
17 、誘惑性偵查比較研究  謝安平（北京工商大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;  
 
【摘要】 誘惑性偵查違背了罪刑法定原則,違反了刑事訴訟的被動(dòng)性和程序正義理念,并且通過(guò)誘惑性偵查所取得的證據(jù)是非法證據(jù)。因而,原則上應(yīng)當(dāng)禁止誘惑性偵查。但是,為了打擊犯罪的需要,在例外情況下,可以允許有條件地使用誘惑性偵查手段。
【Abstract】 From the point of criminal law, temptation investigation betrays the principle of legality. From the point of criminal procedure, it betrays the passivity of criminal procedure and the idea of procedural justice. From the point of criminal evidence law, the evidence obtained by the temptation investigation is illegal. Generally speaking, temptation investigation should be prohibited, but exceptional cases should be permitted while we should put strict limits on some cases.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 誘惑性偵查； 禁止； 例外情況；
【Key words】 temptation investigation prohibit exceptional cases；
 
18 、《公民權(quán)利和政治權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》適用于香港的法理依據(jù)  李薇薇（深圳大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;  
【摘要】 《香港特別行政區(qū)基本法》第39條規(guī)定,《公民權(quán)利和政治權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》適用于香港的規(guī)定繼續(xù)有效。《公約》在香港繼續(xù)適用的理論基礎(chǔ)不是傳統(tǒng)意義上的條約繼承,也不是國(guó)際法上的禁止反言原則,而是"一國(guó)兩制"理論在條約繼承上的一種制度創(chuàng)新�！断愀厶貏e行政區(qū)基本法》在處理人權(quán)條約的繼承方面既體現(xiàn)了國(guó)家主權(quán)、高度自治這一根本原則,又特別重視連續(xù)性原則和人權(quán)保護(hù)原則。
【Abstract】 According to the Basic law Article 39,the provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as applied to Hong Kong shall remain in force. The continued applicability of ICCPR does not base on traditional theory of treaty succession, nor on the estoppels in international law. It is the system innovation in the practice of "one country two systems" in respect of treaty succession. As to the human rights treaty succession, the Basic Law has insisted on fundamental principle of sovereignty and autonomy and also gives special emphasis on the continuity and human rights.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 國(guó)際人權(quán)公約； 條約繼承； 一國(guó)兩制；
【Key words】 international human rights convention succession to treaties one country two systems；
 
19 、試論國(guó)際商事仲裁制度與中國(guó)—東盟知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)爭(zhēng)議解決的契合  高蘭英;宋志國(guó)（桂林電子科技大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;  
【摘要】 隨著中國(guó)—東盟經(jīng)貿(mào)往來(lái)的加強(qiáng),中國(guó)—東盟知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)爭(zhēng)議隨之激增,在訴訟無(wú)法滿足知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)爭(zhēng)議特殊要求的情況下,仲裁以其優(yōu)勢(shì)引起人們的關(guān)注。國(guó)際商事仲裁制度的專(zhuān)業(yè)性、高效性、秘密性、靈活性、國(guó)際性等特點(diǎn)與解決中國(guó)—東盟知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)爭(zhēng)議的各種要求完全可以契合。但是,必須提高爭(zhēng)議當(dāng)事人運(yùn)用仲裁解決爭(zhēng)議的意識(shí),指引當(dāng)事人選擇適當(dāng)?shù)闹俨脵C(jī)構(gòu),完善我國(guó)有關(guān)仲裁的法律規(guī)定,加強(qiáng)仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)建設(shè)。
【Abstract】 With the reinforcement of the economy and trade between China and Association of Southeast Asian Nations, intellectual property rights disputes have increased. Because the lawsuit is unable to meet the special needs of settling intellectual property disputes, arbitration arouses more interest by its advantages. The characteristics of international commercial arbitration, such as specialization,efficiency,secrecy,flexibility,internationalism can definitely agree with different needs of solving China-ASEAN intellectual property rights disputes. As a result, we must enhance the party’s awareness of submitting to arbitration, direct the litigants to select the suitable arbitration agencies, consummate arbitration laws in our country and strengthen the capacity of arbitration institution.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 中國(guó)—東盟； 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)爭(zhēng)議； 國(guó)際商事仲裁；
【Key words】 China-ASEAN intellectual property disputes international commercial arbitration；
 
20 、責(zé)任政府:內(nèi)涵、形式與構(gòu)建路徑  溫輝（國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 依現(xiàn)代民主政治的發(fā)展,責(zé)任政府的外延已由責(zé)任內(nèi)閣制政府?dāng)U展至所有民主政府。就責(zé)任政府而言,責(zé)任應(yīng)是民主政府系統(tǒng)中的核心要素。我國(guó)責(zé)任政府體制包括兩個(gè)組成部分:一是政治問(wèn)責(zé)制,即國(guó)家行政機(jī)關(guān)要對(duì)國(guó)家權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé),國(guó)家行政機(jī)關(guān)首長(zhǎng)要對(duì)自己機(jī)關(guān)的全面工作向國(guó)家權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)政治責(zé)任。二是行政問(wèn)責(zé)制,即行政首長(zhǎng)要對(duì)整個(gè)行政機(jī)關(guān)的工作負(fù)全面責(zé)任,行政首長(zhǎng)具有對(duì)政府組成部門(mén)及其首長(zhǎng)、下級(jí)行政機(jī)關(guān)及其首長(zhǎng)、公務(wù)員的行政問(wèn)責(zé)權(quán)力。目前我國(guó)行政問(wèn)責(zé)在理論、實(shí)踐上還存在一些問(wèn)題。從行政問(wèn)責(zé)逐漸發(fā)展到政治問(wèn)責(zé)是我國(guó)責(zé)任政府建構(gòu)之路徑。
【Abstract】 With the development of modern democratic politics, the responsible government means not only the cabinet system of government, but also all democratic governments. With regard to the responsible government, the responsibility should be the core element. The system of responsible government in China includes two components: one is political accountability, which means administrative organs of the state are responsible to the organ of state power, and means the heads of administrative organs of the state assume overall responsibility for the work to the organs of state power; another is administrative accountability, which means the subordinate departments of administrative organs of the state and their heads, administrative organs at lower levels and their heads, officials are responsible to the heads of administrative organs. At present our administrative accountability still has some problems in theory and practice. Our responsible government should develop gradually from the administrative accountability to political accountability.
 
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 責(zé)任政府； 行政問(wèn)責(zé)； 政治問(wèn)責(zé)； 構(gòu)建路徑；
【Key words】 responsible government administrative accountability political accountability；
 
21 、法律修改時(shí)條文序號(hào)整理模式分析  陳甦（中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院法學(xué)研究所）;  
【摘要】 修改法律要伴隨著法律條文序號(hào)的整理,在我國(guó)的立法實(shí)踐中,基本上是采用全部條文重排的模式。但是,在法律修改時(shí)采用全部條文序號(hào)重排模式具有嚴(yán)重的弊端,容易引起相關(guān)法律制度不必要的連鎖修改,容易導(dǎo)致因修改法律而產(chǎn)生技術(shù)性的疏漏,容易擾亂法律共同體的集體記憶,容易妨礙對(duì)既有法學(xué)文獻(xiàn)的順暢閱讀。因此,在法律修改時(shí)根據(jù)條文刪除或增加的情況,選用適當(dāng)?shù)臈l文序號(hào)整理模式是有很大社會(huì)效益的立法技術(shù)措施。
【Abstract】 Revision of a law is almost always accompanied by the adjustment of the numbering of provisions in the law. In its legislative practice, China basically adopts the mode of renumbering of all provisions in a law during its revision.However,this mode has serious drawbacks: it can easily lead to such problems as unnecessary chain revisions of the relevant laws, technical omissions resulting from the revision of laws, disruption of the collective memories of the legal community, and impediment to the smooth reading of the existing legal literature.Therefore,adopting an appropriate mode of adjusting the numbers of provisions in a law in light of the deletion or supplementation of provisions during its revision is a legislative technique that can have significant social effects.
 
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 法律修改； 條文序號(hào)； 條文刪加率；
【Key words】 revision of law numbering of provisions in a law rate of deletion and supplementation of provisions during the revision of a law；
 
22 、從憲法到普通法:法律文本里的地方立法權(quán)流變考  袁明圣（江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;  
 
【摘要】 地方立法權(quán)的存在和運(yùn)用必須有明確的憲法、法律依據(jù),此乃法治之基本要求。而根據(jù)我國(guó)《憲法》之規(guī)定,除民族自治地方的人大享有自治條例和單行條例的制定權(quán)外,僅授予省、直轄市人大及其常委會(huì)以地方性法規(guī)制定權(quán)。其他地方國(guó)家政權(quán)機(jī)關(guān),包括自治區(qū)人大及其常委會(huì),以及"較大的市"的人大及其常委會(huì)的地方性法規(guī)制定權(quán)、地方人民政府的規(guī)章制定權(quán)等,則是分別通過(guò)《地方組織法》、全國(guó)人大或其常委會(huì)的相關(guān)授權(quán)決定的方式所獲得的,并最終為《立法法》所確認(rèn)。
【Abstract】 The existence and use of local legislative must have a clear constitutional and legal basis. This is the basic requirements of the rule of law. According to the Constitution, except the people’s congresses of national autonomous areas have the power to enact autonomous regulations and specific regulations; only grant the people’s congresses and their standing committees of provinces and municipalities to rulemaking authority. Other local authorities, including the people’s congresses and their standing committees of provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities and "large cities ", their power comes from Local Organization Act and National People’s Congress or its Standing Committee’s authorization decision, and the power was finally confirmed by Legislative Act.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 地方立法權(quán)； 流變； 文本考察；
【Key words】 local legislation transformation text study；
 
23  、憲法在中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義法律體系中的地位與作用  安然（中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院）;   
【摘要】 我國(guó)已建立以憲法為統(tǒng)帥的中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義法律體系,明確憲法在中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義法律體系中的地位,認(rèn)清憲法與部門(mén)法的關(guān)系是關(guān)鍵,憲法的統(tǒng)帥作用將有利于中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義法律體系的不斷完善,有利于社會(huì)主義法制的統(tǒng)一。
【Abstract】 Our country has set up the constitution as the captain’s socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics. Clearing the constitution in the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics in the position and recognizing relationship of the constitution and law is the key. The leader of the constitutional role will be good for the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics and perfect the socialist legal system’s unification.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 憲法； 統(tǒng)帥； 中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義法律體系； 地位； 作用；
【Key words】 constitution captain socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics position function；
 
24 、票據(jù)效力認(rèn)定研究  鄒德剛;王艷梅（吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;  
【摘要】 票據(jù)效力認(rèn)定問(wèn)題是適用票據(jù)法解決票據(jù)糾紛、判斷票據(jù)上權(quán)利義務(wù)的起點(diǎn)。基于票據(jù)商業(yè)貨幣的屬性,流通性和信用性構(gòu)成了票據(jù)的生命力。為了實(shí)現(xiàn)和保障流通性,產(chǎn)生了票據(jù)的諸多理念和規(guī)則。票據(jù)作為有價(jià)證券的基本屬性是票據(jù)效力認(rèn)定的基礎(chǔ);要式證券性是決定票據(jù)效力的因素;在對(duì)票據(jù)效力進(jìn)行解釋時(shí),必須遵循有效性解釋原則。
【Abstract】 Defining the effectiveness of negotiable instrument serves as the origin to choose the applicable method to solve disputes and to judge rights and obligations. Based on its attribute of commercial currency, liquidity and credit constitute the vitality of negotiable instrument. Concepts and rules are made in order to realize and secure the liquidity. So as to define the effectiveness, we shall set the marketable security, the basic attribute, as the foundation; typed securities as the decisive factor. What’s more, the effectiveness interpretation principle must be obeyed.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 票據(jù)效力； 有價(jià)證券； 要式證券； 有效性解釋?zhuān)?BR>【Key words】 effectiveness of negotiable instrument securities typed securities Effectiveness interpretation principle；
 
25 、在合法與非法之間——未經(jīng)許可創(chuàng)作的演繹作品之著作權(quán)辨析  邱寧（重慶理工大學(xué)）;  
【摘要】 未經(jīng)許可創(chuàng)作的演繹作品因其特殊性而游走于合法與非法之間。相對(duì)于原作品而言,未發(fā)表的未經(jīng)許可創(chuàng)作的演繹作品是合法作品,公開(kāi)使用的未經(jīng)許可創(chuàng)作的演繹作品卻是侵權(quán)作品。而相對(duì)于侵犯演繹作品的第三人而言,無(wú)論未發(fā)表還是公開(kāi)使用的未經(jīng)許可創(chuàng)作的演繹作品均因其凝聚了演繹人的智力勞動(dòng)而具有合法性,應(yīng)受到我國(guó)《著作權(quán)法》的保護(hù)。
【Abstract】 Unauthorized deductive works wanders between legality and illegality for its particularity. Relative to the original works, unauthorized deductive works will be legal when it isn’t published, but it will be illegal when it was used in public. Relative to the tortious third-party, unauthorized deductive works is legal because of its owner’s intellective work, so it shall be protected in accordance with the Copyright Law.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 演繹作品； 發(fā)表； 公開(kāi)使用； 許可；
【Key words】 deductive works publication public use authorize；
 
26 、金融資源公平配置與金融監(jiān)管法律制度的完善  田春雷（遼寧大學(xué)法學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 金融資源觀的提出為法學(xué)研究提供了新視角。目前我國(guó)城市與農(nóng)村之間、不同所有制經(jīng)濟(jì)體之間金融資源配置嚴(yán)重不均衡,已經(jīng)影響了社會(huì)公平。趕超戰(zhàn)略下的金融監(jiān)管制度設(shè)計(jì)偏差是金融資源配置失衡的重要原因。為實(shí)現(xiàn)金融資源配置的公平,需要構(gòu)建包容性的金融監(jiān)管法律制度,具體包括包容的金融市場(chǎng)準(zhǔn)入制度和公平的金融市場(chǎng)退出制度。
【Abstract】 The concept of financial resources provides a new perspective for legal research. Currently the allocation of financial resources between urban and rural areas, and the allocation between different forms of ownership economy are seriously unfair, which has affected the social equity. Deviation of the financial regulation system design under the catching up strategy is the reason for the unfair allocation of financial resources. In order to realize the fair allocation, inclusive financial supervision system is needed. It includes an inclusive financial market access system and an fair financial market withdrawal system.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 金融資源； 公平配置； 金融監(jiān)管法律制度；
【Key words】 financial resources fair allocation financial supervision system；
 
27 、社會(huì)正義的司法演繹——周美知申訴案法理評(píng)析  李江發(fā)（湘潭大學(xué)法學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 正義是社會(huì)的價(jià)值追求,法是社會(huì)正義的表達(dá),正義的司法是能夠滿足社會(huì)公眾利益最大化要求的司法。周美知等人不服不起訴決定申訴案的受理和查處,實(shí)現(xiàn)了民眾情感、社會(huì)公理和法律規(guī)范的有機(jī)結(jié)合,揭示了在構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)的語(yǔ)境下司法決定和社會(huì)正義價(jià)值認(rèn)同的必要性與可行性。
【Abstract】 Justice is the pursuit of social value, while law is the expression of social justice. Justice of the judicial can meet the he requirements of justice to maximize the public interest. The appeal case acceptance and investigation of Zhou Meizhi,who is against the decision of not to prosecute, to achieve the people’s emotions, social justice and the combination of legal specification, revealed in the context of building a harmonious society, judicial decisions and the recognition of social justice is necessity and feasibility.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 社會(huì)正義； 司法為民； 法理評(píng)析；
【Key words】 social justice  justice for the people  legal assessment；
 
28 、論程序?qū)π淌聦徟袡?quán)的制約——基于程序自身特性的分析  施亞芬（國(guó)際關(guān)系學(xué)院）;  
【摘要】 程序具有限制權(quán)力恣意運(yùn)行的效用已成為一種共識(shí)。刑事審判權(quán)作為一種國(guó)家權(quán)力,也受到來(lái)自程序的制約。這種制約與程序的角色分化性、交涉性、安定性、自治性等程序自身的一些特性有重要關(guān)系。
【Abstract】 It has become a consensus that the procedure can restrict abuse of any power. AS a kind of state power, criminal trial power also is restricted by the procedure, which has important relations with such characteristics of the criminal procedure as role differentiation, negotiation, stability, self-government.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 刑事審判權(quán)； 程序特性； 程序制約；
【Key words】 criminal trial power characteristics of criminal procedure procedural control；
 
29 、論我國(guó)死刑制度的實(shí)質(zhì)性改革——以《刑法修正案(八)》削減死刑罪名為視角  楊�。ㄈA東政法大學(xué)）; 
【摘要】 《刑法修正案(八)》的出臺(tái)引起社會(huì)高度關(guān)注,因?yàn)榕c以往歷次《刑法》修正案相比,本次《刑法》修改可以說(shuō)是幅度和力度最大的一次�！缎谭ㄐ拚�案(八)》的亮點(diǎn)之一就是削減了死刑罪名,由于死刑是剝奪犯罪人生命的刑罰,因其嚴(yán)厲性、殘酷性、非人道性和不可糾正性而長(zhǎng)期為人所詬病,死刑之存廢也是學(xué)界一直關(guān)注和爭(zhēng)論的焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題,然而,就我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段而言,對(duì)死刑依然保持現(xiàn)狀或輕言完全廢除都不可取,更重要的應(yīng)當(dāng)是在刑事立法和司法適用上對(duì)死刑進(jìn)行有步驟地、漸進(jìn)式地改革。從此意義上說(shuō),《刑法修正案(八)》充分表明我國(guó)已進(jìn)入對(duì)死刑的實(shí)質(zhì)性改革階段。
【Abstract】 The promulgation of Criminal Law Amendment Ⅷ have been paid more and more attention by the whole society, because compared with other past criminal law amendment, this amendment of criminal law is maximal in scope and potency dimension. One of the highlights of Criminal Law Amendment Ⅷ is reducing accusations for death penalty. Death penalty is a kind of punishment on depriving the offender’s life, which become an object of public denunciation owing to its severe,cruel,inhuman and irreversible, so there are many arguments about its existing or abolishing for death penalty.However,it’s desirable to both keep status quo and abolish absolutely, it’s prior to reform death penalty in criminal legislation and juridical application. In this sense, Criminal Law Amendment Ⅷ has made it known that our country is entering the stage of substantive reform of death penalty.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 《刑法修正案(八)》； 死刑罪名； 改革；
【Key words】 Criminal Law Amendment Ⅷ accusations for death penalty reform；
 
30 、操縱證券市場(chǎng)罪的認(rèn)定——以汪建中案為中心  黎旸（清華大學(xué)法學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 《刑法》規(guī)定的操縱證券市場(chǎng)罪行為,和《證券法》規(guī)定的操縱證券市場(chǎng)行為的外延完全相同,只不過(guò)《刑法》進(jìn)一步要求"情節(jié)嚴(yán)重"。"情節(jié)嚴(yán)重"中的"情節(jié)"既包含客觀行為的情節(jié),也包括結(jié)果內(nèi)容,但僅限于客觀違法方面的情節(jié)。只有將表明法益侵害嚴(yán)重的整體評(píng)價(jià)要素之"情節(jié)嚴(yán)重",定性為客觀的超過(guò)要素,才能準(zhǔn)確認(rèn)定操縱證券市場(chǎng)罪。
【Abstract】 Crime of rigging securities exchange has the same extension within both the Criminal Law and Securities Law while criminal responsibility requires one more extra element that is "Substantial Plot”. The "Substantial Plot" contains two objective elements which are plot of act and plot of result. In order to demonstrate the degree of harm done to the investor concurrent with "Substantial Plot" the general evaluating element, a concept of "the Excessive Objective Element" (EOE) shall be brought in to interpret the "Substantial Plot" while ruling on criminal responsibility on securities market manipulation.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 操縱證券市場(chǎng)罪； 情節(jié)嚴(yán)重； 整體評(píng)價(jià)要素； 客觀的超過(guò)要素；
【Key words】 criminal responsibility on securities market manipulation substantial plot the general evaluation element the Excessive Objective Element (EOE)；
 
 

日期：2012-7-24 14:53:34 | 關(guān)閉 |  分享到：